1. Alam MK, Alhabib S, Alzarea BK, et al. 3D CBCT morphometric assessment of mental foramen in Arabic population and global comparison: imperative for invasive and non-invasive procedures in mandible. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018;76(2):98-104. doi:10.1080/00016357. 2017.1387813
2. Gada SK, Nagda SJ. Assessment of position and bilateral symmetry of occurrence of mental foramen in dentate asian population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(2):203-205. doi:10.7860/jcdr/2014/7257.4060
3. Pelé A, Berry P-A, Evanno C, Jordana F. Evaluation of mental foramen with cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review of literature. Radiol Res Pract. 2021/01/06 2021;2021:8897275. doi:10. 1155/2021/8897275
4. Zhang L, Zheng Q. Anatomic relationship between mental foramen and peripheral structures observed by cone-beam computed tomography. Anat Physiol. 2015; 05 (04): 182.
5. Muinelo-Lorenzo J, Suárez-Quintanilla J-A, Fernández-Alonso A, Varela-Mallou J, Suárez-Cunqueiro M-M. Anatomical characteristics and visibility of mental foramen and accessory mental foramen: panoramic radiography vs. cone beam CT. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20(6):e707. doi:10.4317/medoral.20585
6. Aydogdu M, Adisen MZ, Ertas G. The effect of imaging programs and segmentation methods on the accuracy of volume measurements of teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol.2024;138(6):794-802. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2024.07.001
7. Chen JC-H, Lin L-M, Geist JR, Chen J-Y, Chen C-H, Chen Y-K. A retrospective comparison of the location and diameter of the inferior alveolar canal at the mental foramen and length of the anterior loop between American and Taiwanese cohorts using CBCT. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35(1):11-18. doi:10.1007/s00276-012-0986-z
8. Zmyslowska-Polakowska E, Radwanski M, Ledzion S, Leski M, Zmyslowska A, Lukomska-Szymanska M. Evaluation of size and location of a mental foramen in the polish population using cone-beam computed tomography. BioMed Res Int. 2019;2019:1659476. doi:10. 1155/2019/1659476
9. Khojastepour L, Mirbeigi S, Mirhadi S, Safaee A. Location of mental foramen in a selected Iranian population: a CBCT assessment. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(2):117.
10. Shalash M, Khallaf ME, Ali A. Position and dimensions of the mental foramen and presence of the anterior loop in the Egyptian population: a retrospective CBCT study. Bull Natl Res Cent. 2020;44:1-6. doi:10.1186/s42269-020-00364-2
11. Cellina M, Martinenghi C, De Nardi S, et al. Anatomy of the mental foramen: relationship among different metrical parameters for accurate localization. Appl Sci. 2023;13(16):9235. doi:10.3390/app13169235
12. Adisen MZ, Aydogdu M. Evaluation of mandibular canal and mental foramen variations on cone-beam computed tomography images. J Dent Res Rev. 2022;9(1):14-18. doi:10.4103/jdrr.jdrr_9_21
13. Erbasar GNH, Konarili FN, Gülen O, Sancak K. A retrospective evaluation of mental nerve, mental loop, and incisive canal in Turkish population. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi. 2023;12(1):3-11. doi:10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1127806
14. Kalender A, Orhan K, Aksoy U. Evaluation of the mental foramen and accessory mental foramen in Turkish patients using cone-beam computed tomography images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program. Clin Anat. 2012;25(5):584-592. doi:10.1002/ca.21277
15. Direk F, Uysal II, Kivrak AS, Fazliogullari Z, Unver Dogan N, Karabulut AK. Mental foramen and lingual vascular canals of mandible on MDCT images: anatomical study and review of the literature. Anat Sci Int. 2018;93(2):244-253. doi:10.1007/s12565-017-0402-1
16. Sekerci AE, Sahman H, Sisman Y, Aksu Y. Morphometric analysis of the mental foramen in a Turkish population based on multi-slice computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2013;1(1):2-7.
17. Gungor E, Aglarci O, Unal M, Dogan M, Guven S. Evaluation of mental foramen location in the 10-70 years age range using cone-beam computed tomography. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20(1):88-92. doi:10. 4103/1119-3077.178915
18. Alsoleihat F, Al-Omari FA, Al-Sayyed AR, Al-Asmar AA, Khraisat A. The mental foramen: a cone beam CT study of the horizontal location, size and sexual dimorphism amongst living Jordanians. Homo. 2018; 69(6):335-339. doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2018.11.003
19. Sheikhi M, Kheir MK. CBCT assessment of mental foramen position relative to anatomical landmarks. Int J Dent. 2016;2016:5821048. doi: 10.1155/2016/5821048
20. Doğan FB, Akgünlü F. Evaluation of morphologic and morphometric characteristics of the mental foramen and anterior loop in a Turkish subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography. J Dent Indones. 2023;30(3):195-203. doi:10.14693/jdi.v30i3.1531
21. Çaglayan F, Sümbüllü MA, Akgül HM, Altun O. Morphometric and morphologic evaluation of the mental foramen in relation to age and sex: an anatomic cone beam computed tomography study. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(6):2227-2230. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000001080
22. dos Santos Oliveira R, Rodrigues Coutinho M, Kühl Panzarella F. Morphometric analysis of the mental foramen using cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:4571895. doi:10.1155/ 2018/4571895
23. Muinelo-Lorenzo J, Fernández-Alonso A, Smyth-Chamosa E, Suárez-Quintanilla JA, Varela-Mallou J, Suárez-Cunqueiro MM. Predictive factors of the dimensions and location of mental foramen using cone beam computed tomography. PloS one. 2017;12(8):e0179704. doi:10. 1371/journal.pone.0179704
24. Von Arx T, Friedli M, Sendi P, Lozanoff S, Bornstein MM. Location and dimensions of the mental foramen: a radiographic analysis by using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2013;39(12):1522-1528. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.033
25. Raza H, Ali M, Singh VK, Wahjuningrum A, Sarig R, Chaurasia A. Segmentation of mental foramen in orthopantomographs: a deep learning approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:240804763. 2024. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.04763