JRM

Journal of Radiology in Medicine is an international journal that published original research and articles in all areas of radiology. Its publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorial commentaries, letters to the editor, educational articles, and conference/meeting announcements.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Evaluation of pneumatized structures and osteoma frequency in the paranasal region
Aims: The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence of pneumatized structures in the paranasal region and the presence of osteomas.
Methods: Paranasal CT images obtained with Multislice (Philips) 64-slice computed tomography (CT) at Kırıkkale University Hospital in 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Pneumatized variations and the presence of osteoma were evaluated.
Results: The images of 186 patients (93 female and 93 male) with paranasal CT were analyzed. The most common pneumatized variation was middle turbinate bullosa with 40.3%, and the least common was pneumatization of the nasal septum with 2.1%. Anterior clinoid pneumatization was observed in 23.1%, posterior clinoid pneumatization in 2.2%, pneumatization of the uncinate process in 4.9%, and crista galli pneumatization in 4.3%. The frequency of osteomas in the paranasal region was 3.2% (n=6).
Conclusion: Our study will provide a better understanding of paranasal anatomy by providing information about the frequency of pneumatized paranasal variations and the presence of osteomas. This will guide the surgeon in surgical planning and at the time of surgery.


1. Llyod GA, Lund VJ, Scadding GK. CT of paran-sal sinuses andfunctional endoscopic surgery: a critical analysis of 100 symptomaticpatients. J Larinygol Otol. 1991;105(3):181-185.
2. Özdemir A, Arslan S. Incidence of agger nasi and frontal cells andtheir relation to frontal sinusitis in a Turkish population: a CT study.Anatomy. 2018;12(2):71-75.
3. Rice DH. Basix surgical techniques and variations of endoscopic sinussurgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1989;22(4):713-726.
4. Koivunen P, Lopponen H, Fors AP, Jokinen K. The growth rateof osteomas of the paranasal sinuses. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci.1997;22(2):111-114.
5. Erdogan N, Demir U, Songu M, Ozenler NK, Uluç E, Dirim B. Aprospective study of paranasal sinus osteomas in 1,889 cases: changingpatterns of localization. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(12):2355-2359.
6. Messerklinger W. Background and evolution of endoscopic sinussurgery. Ear Nose Throat J. 1994;73(7):449-450.
7. Midilli R, Aladağ G, Erginöz E, Karci B, Savaş R. Anatomic variationsof the paranasal sinuses detected by computed tomography and therelationship between variations and sex. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg.2005;14(3-4):49-56.
8. Stammberger H. Endoscopic endonasal surgery concepts inthe treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part I: anatomic andpathophysiologic considerations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1986;94(2):143-147.
9. Bolger WE, Parsons DS, Butzin CA. Paranasal sinus bony anatomicvariations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinussurgery. Laryngoscope. 1991;101(1):56-64.
10. Mikami T, Minamida Y, Koyanagi I, Baba T, Houkin K. Anatomicalvariations in pneumatization of the anterior clinoid process. JNeurosurg. 2007;106(1):170-174.
11. Özdemir A, Yılmazsoy Y. Evaluation of anatomical variations ofsinonasal region by computed tomography at 3 planes (coronal, axial,sagittal). Anatolian Curr Med J. 2019;1(1):5-8.
12. Burulday V, Muluk NB, Akgül MH, Kaya A, Öğden M. Presenceand types of anterior clinoid process pneumatization, evaluatedby multidetector computerized tomography. Clin Invest Med.2016;39(3):E105-E110.
13. Burulday V, Akgül MH, Muluk NB, Özveren MF, Kaya A. Evaluationof posterior clinoid process pneumatization by multidetector computedtomography. Neurosurg Rev. 2017;40(3):403-409.
14. Orhan İ, Soylu E, Altın G, Yılmaz F, Çalım ÖF, Örmeci T. Paranazalsinüs anatomik varyasyonlarının bilgisayarlı tomografi ile analizi.Abant Med J. 2014;3(2):145-149.
15. Zirek A, Beklen H, Budak RO, Güler OK, Yardımcı AC, Bozkuş F.Paranazal sinüslerde anatomik varyasyonların sıklığı ve enflamatuarsinüs hastalıklarına etkisi. Harran Üniv Tıp Fak Derg. 2016;13(3):215-222.
16. Birkin T, Acar T, Esen Ö. Sinonazal bölge anatomik varyasyonlarıve sinüs hastalıkları ile olan ilişkisi. Tepecik Eğit Araşt Hast Derg.2017;27(3):236-242.
17. Kennedy W, Zinreich SJ. The functional approach to inflammatorysinus disease: cur-rent perspectives and technique modifications. Am JRhinol. 1998;12:576-582.
18. Lee DH, Jung SH, Yoon TM, Lee JK, Joo YE, Lim SC. Characteristics ofparanasal sinus osteoma and treatment outcomes. Acta Oto-Laryngol.2015;135(6):602-607.
19. Turan Ş, Kaya E, Pınarbaşlı MO, Çaklı H. The analysis of patientsoperated for frontal sinus osteomas. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol.2015;53(4):144-149.
20. Rokade A, Sama A. Update on management of frontal sinus osteomas.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;20(1):40-44.
21. Ensari N, Yalçın M, Yılmaz NDS, Yıldız M, Gür ÖE. Frontal osteomaile frontal sinüs büyüklüğü arasındaki ilişki ve bunun cerrahi yöntemseçimine etkisi. J Ankara Univ Fac Med. 2019;72(3):343-348.
22. Cristofaro MG, Giudice A, Amantea M, Riccelli U, Giudice M.Gardner’s syndrome: a clinical and genetic study of a family. Oral SurgOral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115(3):e1-e6.
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2024
Page : 1-4
_Footer